Anchor Legacy Planning Book Free Consultation
Home / Guides / Fund Formation / 3(c)(1) vs 3(c)(7) Exclusion Explained
Fund Formation

3(c)(1) vs 3(c)(7) Exclusion Explained

The short answer

Section 3(c)(1) and Section 3(c)(7) are the two common ways a private fund avoids registering as an investment company. A 3(c)(1) fund can have no more than 100 beneficial owners and cannot offer its securities publicly. A 3(c)(7) fund has no fixed cap on investors but can sell only to qualified purchasers, generally individuals with at least $5 million in investments. Each has its own counting and look-through rules.

This page is general information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Rules change and every situation is different. Talk to a licensed attorney before acting on any of it. Last updated 2026-11-02.

Why the exclusions matter

The Investment Company Act of 1940 regulates companies that primarily invest in securities, with detailed rules on governance, custody, leverage and fees. A private fund cannot practically comply, so it relies on an exclusion. If a fund does not qualify for an exclusion, it may have to register or stop operating, so the choice is made before the first investor is admitted.

Side by side

Section 3(c)(1)Section 3(c)(7)
Investor cap100 beneficial ownersNo fixed cap, though other securities-law thresholds apply
Who can investTypically accredited investors in a Regulation D offeringQualified purchasers only
Qualified purchaserNot requiredIndividuals owning at least $5 million in investments, with higher thresholds for entities
Public offeringNot allowedNot allowed
Best forSmaller funds with a modest investor countFunds seeking wealthy investors in larger numbers

Counting investors under 3(c)(1)

The 100-owner limit counts beneficial owners, not just record holders. Look-through rules can require counting the owners of an entity investor if that entity owns 10 percent or more of the fund and was formed to invest in it. Knowledgeable employees of the sponsor are generally not counted. A sponsor planning to grow needs to track the count carefully and leave room.

Qualified purchasers

Most individuals do not meet the qualified purchaser standard, which generally requires $5 million in investments, not net worth. Investments are defined by statute and exclude a primary residence. Certain family businesses and entities with at least $25 million in investments also qualify. Investors usually represent their status in a subscription questionnaire, and the sponsor should have a reasonable basis for relying on it.

Other exclusions

See real estate fund vs syndication and what a private fund is.

Talk to an attorney about your situation

Free consultation with a partner attorney. No cost, no obligation.

Book Free Consultation

Frequently asked questions

Can a fund use both 3(c)(1) and 3(c)(7)?

A single fund relies on one. A sponsor may run parallel funds, one under each exclusion, for different investor types.

What happens if a 3(c)(1) fund exceeds 100 investors?

It loses the exclusion unless it restructures. Track investor counts and any look-through carefully.

Does a fund have to file anything for the exclusion?

The exclusions are self-executing and require no filing, but they affect what the fund and its manager must do under other laws.

Is net worth the same as investments for qualified purchasers?

No. The test counts specific investment assets and excludes a primary residence.

Related questions

This page is for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Anchor Legacy Planning is not a law firm; legal work is performed by independent, licensed attorneys. Anchor Legacy Planning does not offer, sell, or solicit investments and does not give investment advice.